Identity, Integration, and Loyalty in Estonia: A Relational Comparative Analysis of Immigrant Integration
Keywords:
relational integration, immigrant integration, loyalty, Estonia, Russian-speaking minority, securitizationAbstract
This article presents a relational comparative analysis of Estonian integration, building directly on Marju Lauristin’s cluster analysis and national defense index in the Estonian Integration Monitoring 2023. Drawing on relational integration theory and John W. Berry’s acculturation framework, it maps Lauristin’s clusters onto Berry’s four strategies and traces ethnic differences in trust, belonging, support for NATO, and military aid to Ukraine. The analysis identifies important limitations in Lauristin’s symmetric design: even when integration is framed as a two-sided process, asymmetrical power relations persist, and acculturation strategies continue to collapse into assimilation, separation, or marginalization. The post-2022 security context amplified these pre-existing cleavages. Vetik’s national unity-versus-equal-rights imperatives remain central, yet the majority has claimed the moral high ground by framing strong support for Ukraine as a loyalty test. And the relational lens shows that this securitization of integration has proved counterproductive, widening trust gaps across the whole society.
References
Alba, R. (2020). The Great Demographic Illusion. Majority, Minority, and the Expanding American Mainstream. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691202112
Alba, R. (2024). Culture’s role in assimilation and integration: the expansion and growing diversity of U.S. popular culture. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 50(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2213046
Alba, R., & Nee, V. (2003). Remaking the American Mainstream. Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration. Harvard University Press.
Berry, J. W. (1970). Marginality, Stress and Ethnic Identification in an Acculturated Aboriginal Community. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100303
Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, Acculturation, and Adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x
Berry, J. W. (2019). Acculturation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589666
Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a Relational Sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317. https://doi.org/10.1086/231209
Favell, A. (2019). Integration: Twelve propositions after Schinkel. Comparative Migration Studies, 7, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-019-0125-7
Favell, A. (2022). The integration nation: Immigration and Colonial Power in Liberal Democracies. Polity.
Grigoryev, D., Berry, J. W., Stogianni, M., Nguyen, A. M. D., Bender, M., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2023). The integration hypothesis: A critical evaluation informed by multilevel metaanalyses of three multinational datasets. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 97, 101897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2023.101897
Klarenbeek, L. M. (2019). Reconceptualising ‘integration as a two-way process’. Migration Studies, 9(3), 902–921. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnz033
Klarenbeek, L. M. (2024). Relational integration: from integrating migrants to integrating social relations. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 50(1), 233–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2259038
Kultuuriministeerium [Ministry of Culture]. (2011). Eesti ühiskonna lõimumismonitooring 2011 [Estonian society integration monitoring 2011]. Online: https://www.kul.ee/sites/default/files/documents/2020-10/integratsiooni_monitooring_2011.pdf
Kultuuriministeerium [Ministry of Culture]. (2015). Eesti ühiskonna lõimumismonitooring 2015 [Estonian society integration monitoring 2015]. Online: https://www.ibs.ee/wpcontent/uploads/Integration-Monitoring-Estonia-2015.pdf
Kultuuriministeerium [Ministry of Culture]. (2023). Eesti ühiskonna lõimumismonitooring 2023 [Estonian society integration monitoring 2023]. Online: https://www.kul.ee/sites/default/files/documents/2024-04/EIM%202023%20aruanne.pdf
Lauristin, M. (2023). Raw crosstables from the Estonian Integration Monitoring 2023 [unpublished raw data]. Personal communication.
Polynin, I. (2024). Relational integration/assimilation? A critical dialog with postcolonial and mainstream perspectives. Frontiers in Political Science, 6, Article 1493637. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1493637
Riigikantselei [Republic of Estonia Government Office]. (2025a). Avaliku arvamuse seireuuringu raport. 25. uuringulaine. 15.-22. detsember 2025 [Public Opinion Monitoring Survey. 25th wave. 15-22. December 2025]. Online: https://riigikantselei.ee/sites/default/files/documents/2026-01/2025%2012%20AA%2025%20seire%20raport%20-%20avaldamiseks.pdf
Riigikantselei [Republic of Estonia Government Office]. (2025b). Avaliku arvamuse seireuuring. 24. serie. 17.-21. sptember 2025 [Public Opinion Monitoring Survey. 24th wave. 17-21. September 2025]. Online: https://riigikantselei.ee/sites/default/files/documents/2026-03/2025%2009%20AA%2024%20seire%20raport%20-%20avaldamiseks.pdf
Schinkel, W. (2018). Against ‘immigrant integration’: for an end to neocolonial knowledge production. Comparative Migration Studies, 6, Article 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0095-1
Statham, P., & Foner, N. (2024). Assimilation and integration in the twenty-first century: where have we been and where are we going?. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 50(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2293537
Tilly, C. (2005). Identities, Boundaries and Social Ties. Paradigm Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315634050
Vetik, R. (2019). National Identity as Interethnic (De)mobilization: A Relational Approach. Ethnopolitics, 18(4), 406–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2019.1613065
Wright, H., & Kook, U. (Eds.) (2025, July 3). President sends church influence law back to Riigikogu for a second time. ERR News. Online: https://news.err.ee/1609736706/presidentsends-church-influence-law-back-to-riigikogu-for-a-second-time
