Power and Narratives in the Era of Behavioral Government
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54201/iajas.204Keywords:
choice architecture, libertarian paternalism, manipulation, nudgesAbstract
Behavioral government employs tools like nudges to steer behavior toward certain practices, raising ethical concerns if the underlying narratives are not transparent or inclusive. In this context, it has been debated whether these types of policies are a source of manipulation or rather are practices inherent to a libertarian paternalism. This article attempts to answer this question from an analysis of power. In contrast to theorizations of power in terms of force or pure domination, it is possible to establish a theoretical framework that understands power in an inclusive manner, as a capacity for order, and from there establish a rational framework for evaluating the narratives implicit in this type of policies. We propose that, within a framework of dialogue and shared values, power need not be coercive to be effective. The discussion concludes that narratives, when aligned with the common good and grounded in clear reasoning, legitimize behavioral government as an ethical and collaborative approach to addressing contemporary social challenges.
References
Adler, E., & Bernstein, S. (2005). Knowledge in power: the epistemic construction of global governance. In M. Barnett, & R. Duvall (Eds.), Power in Global Governance (pp. 294–318). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491207.013
Arendt, H. (1998). The Human Condition. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226924571.001.0001
Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably Irrational. Harper Collins.
Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1970). Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press.
Battaglio, P. R., Belardinelli, P., Bellé, N., & Cantarelli, P. (2019). Behavioral Public Administration ad fontes: A Synthesis of Research on Bounded Rationality, Cognitive Biases, and Nudging in Public Organizations. Public Administration Review, 79(3), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12994
Battegazzorre, F. (2017). Some reflections on the power to/power over debate. Journal of Political Power, 10(3), 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2017.1382169
Castells, M. (2011). A Network Theory of Power. International Journal of Communication, 5, 773–787. Online: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1136
Chetty, R. (2015). Behavioral Economics and Public Policy: A Pragmatic Perspective. American Economic Review, 105(5), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20151108
Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830020303
De la Cruz Prego, F. (2021). The Role of the State in the 2030 Agenda: An Economic Policy Approach. Revista de Economía Mundial, 63, 97–116. https://doi.org/10.33776/rem.vi63.7149
Dowding, K. (2019). Rational Choice and Political Power. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781529206340
Dowding, K., & Oprea, A. (2024). Manipulation in politics and public policy. Economics and Philosophy, 40(3), 685-710. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267124000063
Fisher, W. (1989). Human Communication as Narration: Toward a Philosophy of Reason, Value, and Action. University of South Carolina Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1nwbqtk
Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977 (pp. 109–133). Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1997). Il faut défendre la société: Cours au Collège de France, 1976. Gallimard/Seuil.
Foucault, M. (2009). Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–1978. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245075
Foucault, M. (2014). The politics of health in the eighteenth century. Foucault Studies, 18, 113–127. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i18.4654
Galizzi, M. M. (2017). Behavioral aspects of policy formulation: experiments, behavioral insights, nudges. In M. Howlett, I. Mukherjee, & S. Fraser (Eds.), Handbook of Policy Formulation. Handbooks of Research on Public Policy (pp. 410–429). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784719326.00034
Gigerenzer, G. (2014). Breast cancer screening pamphlets mislead women. All women and women’s organizations should tear up the pink ribbons and campaign for honest information. British Medical Journal, 348, g2636. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2636
Gofen, A., Moseley, A., Thomann, E., & Weaver, R. K. (2021). Behavioural governance in the policy process: introduction to the special issue. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(5), 633–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1912153
Grewal, D. S. (2008). Network Power. The Social Dynamics of Globalization. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300145120
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Jilke, S., Olsen, A. L., & Tummers, L. G. (2017). Behavioral Public Administration: Combining Insights from Public Administration and Psychology. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12609
Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2012). Old wine in new casks: libertarian paternalism still violates liberal principles. Social Choice and Welfare, 38, 635–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-011-0636-0
Haas, P. M. (1992). Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442
Halpern, D., & Sanders, M. (2016). Nudging by Government: Progress, Impact, & Lessons Learned. Behavioral Science & Policy, 2(2), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/237946151600200206
Hallsworth, M., Egan, M., Rutter, J., & McCrae, J. (2018). Gobierno conductual: Aplicación de las ciencias del comportamiento para mejorar la toma de decisiones de los gobiernos. Behavioural Insights Team. Online: https://www.bi.team/publications/gobierno-conductual/
Hallsworth, M., List, J. A., Metcalfe, R. D., & Vlaev, I. (2017). The behavioralist as tax collector: Using natural field experiments to enhance tax compliance. Journal of Public Economics, 148, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.02.003
Han, B.-C. (2005). Was ist Macht?. Reclam.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Lehner, M., Mont, O., & Heiskanen, E. (2015). Nudging – A promising tool for sustainable consumption behaviour?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.086
Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A Radical View. Macmillan.
Madrian, B. C., & Shea, D. F. (2001). The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1149–1187. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301753265543
Miller, P., Kable, J. W., & Lempert, K. M. (2024). Willingness to wait outperforms delay discounting in predicting drinking severity. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 122(3), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.4210
Moseley, A., & Thomann, E. (2021). A behavioural model of heuristics and biases in frontline policy implementation. Policy and Politics, 49(1), pp. 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557320X15967973532891
Osman, M., & Thornton, K. (2019). Traffic light labelling of meals to promote sustainable consumption and healthy eating. Appetite, 138, 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.03.015
Parsons, T. (1967). Sociological Theory and Modern Society. Free Press.
Pettit, P. (1996). Freedom as Antipower. Ethics, 106(3), 576–604. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446215272.n18
Porter, T. (2009). Global Governance as Configurations of State/Non-State Activity. In J. Whitman (Ed.), Palgrave Advances in Global governance (pp. 87–104). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245310_5
Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press.
Schön, D., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. Basic Books.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Sassen, S. (2006). Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton University Press. Online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7sx98
Simon, H. (1978). Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought. The American Economic Review, 68(2), 1–16. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1816653
Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Nudging: A Very Short Guide. Consumer Policy, 37, 583–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-014-9273-1
Sunstein, C. R. (2019). Conformity. The Power of Social Influences. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479896585.001.0001
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2003). Libertarian Paternalism. American Economic Review, 93(2), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321947001
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press.
Thomann, E., van Engen, N. A. M., & Tummers, L. (2018). The necessity of discretion: A behavioral evaluation of bottom-up implementation theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 583–601. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy024
Thomas, M. D. (2019). Reapplying behavioral symmetry: public choice and choice architecture. Public Choice, 180, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-018-0537-1
Wartenberg, T. E. (1990). The Forms of Power. From Domination to Transformation. Temple University Press.
White, M. D. (2013). The Manipulation of Choice. Ethics and Libertarian Paternalism. Palgrave Macmillan.
Wilkinson, T. M. (2013). Nudging and Manipulation. Political Studies, 61, 341–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00974.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Manuel C. Ortiz de Landázuri, Alejandro Cid Moreno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
