Policy Content and Governance: A Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54201/iajas.178Keywords:
policy content, policy design, policy components, policy mix, policy analysisAbstract
In the scholarship and teaching of public policy, policy content has often been a neglected area, despite the fact that policy content is an important mediating factor in policy implementation, governance, structural arrangements, and coordination, among others. This, despite the presence of complex problems in the complex 21st century, requires multiple policies, in multiple governance arrangements, to solve these policy problems. This perspective article discusses the importance of studying these issues, in complement to other approaches, from a policy content perspective to allow for more precise analysis and examination of policy implementation and governance with the possibility of a more nuanced understanding of governance. From a policy design-as-content perspective, it is possible that hidden insights can emerge beyond studying policy as a ‘single dependent variable’, whilst the disaggregation of policy content into components, and interacting components across policies, could provide important insights for public administration scholarship and public administration and policy education.
References
Adam, C., Hurka, S., Knill, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2019). Policy Accumulation and the Democratic Responsiveness Trap. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108646888.010
Agranoff, R. and McGuire, M., 2003. Inside the Matrix: Integrating the Paradigms of Intergovernmental and Network Management. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(12), 1401–1422. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-120024403
Ambrose, G., Gregoire-Zawilski, M., Siddiki, S., & Oesterling, N. (2024). Understanding policy evolution using institutional grammar: net metering policies in the United States. Policy Design and Practice, 7(2), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2024.2342093
Angulo-Cázares, R. (2018). Agency problems in basic education in Mexico: an institutional diagnosis. Convergencia, 25(77), 149–173. https://doi.org/10.29101/crcs.v25i77.9224
Capano, G. (2020). The Rise of the Governance Mantra and Comparative Policy Analysis. In In I. Geva-May, B. G. Peters, & J. Muhleisen (Eds.), Institutions and governance in comparative policy analysis studies (pp. 13–24). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429441622
Capano, G. (2024). Policy Instruments. In M. van Gerven, A. C. Rothmayr, & K. Schubert (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of Public Policy (pp. 1–6). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90434-0_30-1
Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2021). Causal logics and mechanisms in policy design: How and why adopting a mechanistic perspective can improve policy design. Public Policy and Administration, 36(2), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076719827068
Capano, G., & Engeli, I. (2022). Using Instrument Typologies in Comparative Research: Conceptual and Methodological Trade-Offs. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 24(2), 99–116. http://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2020.1871297
Capano, G., & Toth, F. (2023). Health policy under the microscope: a micro policy design perspective. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1180836. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1180836
Cashore, B. (2022). A note on Cashore and Howlett’s policy taxonomy: Origins and evolution. Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy. Online: https://bit.ly/4oeZpIV
Cashore, B., & Howlett, M. (2007). Punctuating which equilibrium? Understanding thermostatic policy dynamics in Pacific Northwest forestry. American journal of political science, 51(3), 532–551. Online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4620083?origin=JSTOR-pdf
Cejudo, G. M., & Michel, C. L. (2017). Addressing fragmented government action: Coordination, coherence, and integration. Policy Sciences, 50, 745–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9281-5
Crawford, S.E. & Ostrom, E. (1995). A grammar of institutions. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 582–600. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082975
De Wee, G., & Ramolobe, K. (2025). Public administration, governance, and policy integration: towards a scholarship agenda of a neglected area. Journal of Policy Studies, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.52372/jps.e678
De Wee, G. (2025) A conceptual systems approach to policy product integration to overcome policy fragmentation [Conference paper presented at the 69th Annual Metting of the International Society for the System Sciences]. Online: https://bit.ly/49rlfoS
Denny, E. S., & Zittoun, P. (Eds.). (2024). Handbook of teaching public policy. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800378117
Dunlop, C. A., Kamkhaji, J. C., & Radaelli, C. M. (2019). A sleeping giant awakes? The rise of the Institutional Grammar Tool (IGT) in policy research. Journal of Chinese Governance, 4(2), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2019.1575502
Dye, T. R. (1976). Policy Analysis: What Governments Do, Why They Do It, and What Difference It Makes. University of Alabama Press.
Frantz, C. K., & S. Siddiki. (2022). Institutional Grammar. Foundations and Applications for Institutional Analysis. Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86372-2
Goyal, N., & Howlett, M. (2022). Tools in internal and external evaluations. In M. Howlett (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of policy tools (pp. 401–412). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003163954
Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.2307/422246
Hinterleitner, M., Knill, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2024). The growth of policies, rules, and regulations: A review of the literature and research agenda. Regulation & Governance, 18(2), 637-654. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12511
Hogan, J., & Howlett, M. (Eds.). (2015). Policy Paradigms in Theory and Practice. Discourses, Ideas and Anomalies in Public Policy Dynamics. Palgrave.
Howlett, M. (2000) Managing the ‘‘hollow state’’: procedural policy instruments and modern governance. Canadian Public Administration, 43(4), 412–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2000.tb01152.x
Howlett, M. (2010). Designing Public Policies. Principles and Instruments. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838631
Howlett, M. (2014). From the ‘old’ to the ‘new’ policy design: Design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance. Policy Sciences, 47, 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-014-9199-0
Howlett, M. (2022). The Routledge Handbook of Policy Tools. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003163954
Howlett, M. & Ramesh, M. (2022). Designing for adaptation: Static and dynamic robustness in policy‐making. Public Administration, 101(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12849
Howlett, M. & Rayner, J. (2007). Design Principles for Policy Mixes: Cohesion and Coherence in ‘New Governance Arrangements’. Policy and Society, 26(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1449-4035(07)70118-2
Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2013). Patching vs Packaging in Policy Formulation: Assessing Policy Portfolio Design. Politics and governance, 1(2), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.12924/pag2013.01020170
Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2018). Coherence, Congruence and Consistency in Policy Mixes. In M. Howlett, & I. Mukherjee (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Policy Design (pp. 389–403). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351252928
Howlett, M. P., Ramesh, M., & Capano, G. (2023). The Micro-Dimensions of Policy Design: A Key Challenge for Real-World Policy Practice. SSRN, 4410177. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4410177
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Capano, G. (2024). The role of tool calibrations and policy specifications in policy change: evidence from healthcare reform efforts in Korea 1990-2020. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 17(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2022.2030276
Koontz T. M., & Thomas, C. W. (2012). Measuring the Performance of Public-Private Partnerships: A Systematic Method for Distinguishing Outputs from Outcomes. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(4), 769–786. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576350410
Knill, C., Steinbacher, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2021). Balancing Trade‐Offs between Policy Responsiveness and Effectiveness: The Impact of Vertical Policy‐Process Integration on Policy Accumulation. Public Administration Review, 81(1), 157–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13274
Lasswell, H. D. (1951). The Policy Orientation. In D. Lerner, & H. D. Lasswell (Eds.), The Policy Sciences: Recent Developments in Scope and Method (pp. 3–15). Stanford University Press.
Lejano, R. P., & Shankar, S. (2013). The contextualist turn and schematics of institutional fit: Theory and a case study from southern India. Policy Sciences, 46, 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9163-9
Lejano, R. P., & Park, S. J. (2015). The autopoietic text. In F. Fischer, D. Torgerson, A. Durnová, & M. Orsini (Eds.), Handbook of Critical Policy Studies (pp. 274–296). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783472352.00023
Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1988). The analysis of design or the design of analysis?. Review of Policy Research, 7(4), 738–750. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1988.tb00892.x
Lowi, T. J. (1964). American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies, and Political Theory. World Politics, 16(4), 677–715. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009452
May, P. J., & Jochim, A. E. (2013). Policy Regime Perspectives: Policies, Politics, and Governing. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 426–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12024
May, P. J., Sapotichne, J., & Workman, S. (2006). Policy Coherence and Policy Domains. Policy Studies Journal, 34(3), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00178.x
Mettler, S. (2016). The Policyscape and the Challenges of Contemporary Politics to Policy Maintenance. Perspectives on Politics, 14(2), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592716000074
Migone, A., & Howlett, M. (2024). The purpose of policy portfolios: design, intention, and logic. Journal of Public Policy, 44(4), 809–825. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X24000229
Olivier, T. (2019). How Do Institutions Address Collective-Action Problems? Bridging and Bonding in Institutional Design. Political Research Quarterly, 72(1), 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918784199
Ostrom, V. (1962). Political Economy of Water Development, The American Economic Review, 52(2), 450-458
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831739
Petek, A., Zgurić, B., Šinko, M., Petković, K., Munta, M., Kovačić, M., Kekez, A., & Baketa, N. (2022). From hierarchy to continuum: Classifying the technical dimension of policy goals. Policy Sciences, 55, 715–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09476-0
Peters, B. G., Capano, G., Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., Chou, M. H., & Ravinet, P. (2018). Designing for Policy Effectiveness. Defining and Understanding a Concept. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108555081
Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2008). Governance and social complexity. Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift, 110(3), 239–248. Online: https://journals.lub.lu.se/st/article/view/8577
Peter, S., Le Provost, G., Mehring, M., Müller, T., & Manning, P. (2022). Cultural worldviews consistently explain bundles of ecosystem service prioritisation across rural Germany. People and Nature, 4(1), 218–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10277
Rapley, J. (1997). Understanding Development. Theory and Practice in the Third World. Lynne Rienner. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685859138
Sager, F., & Thomann, E. (2017). Multiple streams in member state implementation: Politics, problem construction and policy paths in Swiss asylum policy. Journal of Public Policy, 37(3), 287–314. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X1600009X
Salamon, L. M. (Ed.). (2002). The tools of government. A Guide to the New Governance. Oxford University Press.
Schlager, E., & Cox, M. (2018). The IAD Framework and the SES Framework: An Introduction and Assessment of the Ostrom Workshop Frameworks. In C. M. Weible, & P. A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 215–252). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494284
Schneider, A. L., & Ingram, H. (1997). Policy design for democracy. University Press of Kansas.
Siddiki, S. (2020). Understanding and Analyzing Public Policy Design. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108666985
Siddiki, S., & Curley, C. (2022). Conceptualising policy design in the policy process. Policy & Politics, 50(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16346727541396
Siddiki, S., Heikkila, T., Weible, C. M., Pacheco‐Vega, R., Carter, D., Curley, C., Deslatte, A., & Bennett, A. (2022). Institutional Analysis with the Institutional Grammar. Policy Studies Journal, 50(2), 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12361
Siddiki, S., Weible, C. M., Basurto, X., & Calanni, J. (2011). Dissecting Policy Designs: An Application of the Institutional Grammar Tool. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00397.x
Weible, C. M, & Cairney, P. (2021) Practical lessons from Policy Theories. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447359821.001.0001
Weitz, N., Strambo, C., Kemp-Benedict, E., & Nilsson, M. (2017). Closing the governance gaps in the water-energy-food nexus: Insights from integrative governance. Global Environmental Change, 45, 165-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.06.006
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Guswin de Wee
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
