Is the Welfare Partnership’s End in Sight?
Germany’s Government/Nonprofit Relations under the Strains of COVID
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54201/iajas.162Keywords:
third-party government, interdependence theory, welfare partnership, government/nonprofit relationship, human services, Germany, COVID-19Abstract
This article provides an overview of how German social welfare nonprofits in health and human services fared during the COVID-19 pandemic to gauge whether the historically strong complementary relationship between the sectors has continued to hold. Conceptually, we use third-party governance theory to frame German social welfare policy and see what the pandemic experience suggests about government/nonprofit relations. Using an exploratory approach, the analysis is based on a national CAWI survey, conducted in late 2020, covering initial effects of the pandemic and nonprofit countermeasures; financial and non-financial impacts; and the uptake of support programs. The survey data presents the first attempt to analyze the pandemic effects on the most crucial component of Germany’s social welfare infrastructure. The findings suggest that while the traditional partnership still exists, the government showed little interest in addressing the needs of nonprofits. This raises questions as to whether neo-liberal policies have undercut the sense that government is as dependent on nonprofits in social welfare service provision as nonprofits are on government support.
References
Anheier, H. K. (1992). An Elaborate Network: Profiling the Third Sector in Germany. In B. Gidron, R. Kramer, & L. M. Salamon (Eds.), Government and the Third Sector: Emerging Relationships in Welfare States. Jossey-Bass.
Anheier, H. K., & Seibel, W. (1997). Germany. In L. M. Salamon, & H. K. Anheier (Eds.), Defining the Nonprofit Sector (pp.128–168). Manchester University Press.
Anheier, H. K., & Toepler, S. (2023). Nonprofit Organizations: Theory, Management, Policy (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429299681
Anheier, H. K, Toepler, S., & Sokolowski, S. (1997). The implications of government funding for non‐profit organizations: Three propositions. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 10(3), 190–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513559710166057
AWO Bezirksverband Westliches Westfalen. (2020). Corona-Krise: Freie Wohlfahrtspflege warnt vor Insolvenz sozialer Dienste und Einrichtungen. Online: https://www.awo-ww.de/node/23975
Bae, K. B., & Sohn, H. (2018). Factors Contributing to the Size of Nonprofit Sector: Tests of Government Failure, Interdependence, and Social Capital Theory. Voluntas, 29(3), 470–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9888-3
Backhaus-Maul, H., & Langner, C. (2014). Voluntary Involvement in German Welfare Organizations. In M. Freise, & T. Hallmann (Eds.), Modernizing Democracy (pp. 111–120). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0485-3_9
BAGFW (Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft der Freien Wohlfahrtspflege). (2020, March 23). Freie Wohlfahrtspflege unter Rettungsschirm der Bundesregierung [Press release]. Online: https://tinyurl.com/4h7hzbxj
Benevolenski, V., Ivanova, N., & Jakobson, L. (2023). Social Origins Theory: Untapped Potential and the Test by the Pandemic Crisis. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 14(4), 317–344. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2022-0029
BMWI (Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie). (2020). Überbrückungshilfe Unternehmen – Fragen und Antworten zu den Novemberhilfen. Online: https://tinyurl.com/3rdykz27
BMWI (Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz). (2022, June 27). Überblickspapier Corona-Hilfen: Rückblick – Bilanz- Lessons Learned. Online: https://tinyurl.com/47ser85y
BMWI (Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie), & BMF (Bundesministerium der Finanzen). (2021). Überbrückungshilfe II. Online: https://tinyurl.com/4u9kka42
Deutsche Krankenhausgesellschaft. (2020, September 1). Krankenhausstatistik – Eckdaten der Krankenhausversorgung. Online: https://tinyurl.com/yc7rkevt
Deutscher Bundestag. (2013). Bericht zur Risikoanalyse im Bevölkerungsschutz 2012. Drucksache 17/12051 of January 3, 2013. Online: https://tinyurl.hu/olyR
Diakonie Deutschland. (2020, March 21). Diakonie-Zitat: Freie Wohlfahrtspflege muss unter Corona-Rettungsschirm – Pleitewelle droht. Online: https://tinyurl.com/ycdnawuc
Ehrenamt24. (2021): Corona Soforthilfen für Vereine. Online: https://tinyurl.com/3vm5z5f9
Feiler, S., & Breuer, C. (2021). Perceived Threats through COVID-19 and the Role of Organizational Capacity: Findings from Non-Profit Sports Clubs. Sustainability, 13(12), 6937. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126937
Flanigan, S. T., & Abdel‐Samad, M. (2009). Hezbollah’s Social Jihad: Nonprofits as Resistance Organizations. Middle East Policy, 16(2), 122–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4967.2009.00396.x
Gidron, B., Salamon, L. M., & Kramer, R. M. (Eds.). (1992). Government and the third sector: Emerging relationships in welfare states. Jossey-Bass.
Grunau, A. (2021, March 22). Pflege auf der Intensivstation: “Du tust alles, es ist nicht genug.” Deutsche Welle. Online: https://tinyurl.com/twbxhacr
Haß, R., & Serrano-Velarde, K. (2015). When Doing Good Becomes a State Affair: Voluntary Service in Germany. Voluntas, 26(5), 1718–1738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9577-z
Hattke, F., & Martin, H. (2020). Collective Action during the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Case of Germany’s Fragmented Authority. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 42(4), 614–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2020.1805273
Heinze, R. G. (2020). Gesellschaftsgestaltung durch Neujustierung von Zivilgesellschaft, Staat und Markt. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30907-7
Hensel, F. (2020, March 13). Corona-Krise: Schutz vor Insolvenzen im sozialen Sektor. Offener Brief an Ministerpräsidenten Armin Laschet. Online: https://tinyurl.com/yrt359hr
Jang, H., Valero, J., & Ford, S. (2023). Homeless Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Revisiting Salamon’s Voluntary Failure Theory. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 14(3), 279–308. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2022-0037
Kövér Á. (2021). The Relationship between Government and Civil Society in the Era of COVID-19. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 12(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2021-0007
Lecy, J. D., & Van Slyke, D. M. (2013). Nonprofit sector growth and density: Testing theories of government support. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 189–214. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus010
Meyer, M., Millner, R., Mehrwald, M., & Rameder, P. (2024). A Test for the Welfare-Partnership: Austria’s Nonprofit Human Service Organizations in Times of Covid-19. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 48(3), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2023.2186556
Meyer, M., Millner, R., Pennerstorfer, A., & Vandor, P. (2021). Partnership in Times of COVID-19: Government and Civil Society in Austria. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 12(1), 65–92. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2020-0052
Pape, U., Brandsen, T., Pahl, J. B., Pieliński, B., Baturina, D., Brookes, N., Chaves-Ávila, R., Kendall, J., Matančević, J., Petrella, F., Rentzsch, C., Richez-Battesti, N., Savall-Morera, T., Simsa, R., & Zimmer, A. (2020). Changing Policy Environments in Europe and the Resilience of the Third Sector. Voluntas, 31(1), 238–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-00087-z
Pape, U., Chaves-Ávila, R., Pahl, J. B., Petrella, F., Pieliński, B., & Savall-Morera, T. (2016). Working under pressure: economic recession and third sector development in Europe. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 36(7–8), 547–566. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-01-2016-0010
Pope Pius XI. (1931). Quadragesimo Anno – On Reconstruction of the Social Order. Online: https://tinyurl.com/pymarxy5
Preston, V., Shields, J., & D’Souza, J. (2024). Transforming settlement and integration services during a pandemic. International Migration, 62(2), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13245
Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in Public Service. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801849626
Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1998). The Third Route: Government-Nonprofit Collaboration in Germany and the United States. In W. Powell, & E. Clemens (Eds.), Private Action and the Public Good (pp. 151–162). Yale University Press.
Salamon, L. M., & Newhouse, C. (2020). The 2020 Nonprofit Employment Report [Nonprofit Economic Data Bulletin no. 48]. Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.
Salamon, L. M., & Toepler, S. (2015). Government–Nonprofit Cooperation: Anomaly or Necessity?. Voluntas, 26(6), 2155–2177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9651-6
Schrader, M. (2021). Zivilgesellschaft in und nach der Pandemie: Bedarfe-Angebote-Potenziale [Opusculum no. 149]. Maecenata Institut für Philanthropie und Zivilgesellschaft. Online: https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/72852
Schrader, M., Strachwitz, R. G., & Roth, J. (2020). Ein Rettungsschirm für die Zivilgesellschaft? Eine explorative Studie zu Potenzialen, Bedarfen und Angeboten in und nach der COVID-19 Krise [Opusculum no. 144]. Maecenata Institut für Philanthropie und Zivilgesellschaft. Online: https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/70032
Seibel, W. (2022). Successful Failure: Functions and Dysfunctions of Civil Society Organizations. In M. Hoelscher, R. List, A. Ruser, & S. Toepler (Eds.), Civil Society: Concepts, Challenges, Contexts (pp. 69–81). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98008-5_5
Shafiq, S., Albrecht, K., & LeRoux, K. (2023). Extending the Interdependence Theory to Local Public Service Provision: Evidence from Iowa. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 14(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2022-0036
Stebbins, R. (2001). Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984249
Strachwitz, R. (2023). Sustainable Development Goals: Was gehen sie die Freie Wohlfahrtspflege an?. In G. Timm, & M. Vilain (Eds.), Freie Wohlfahrtspflege und Klimawandel: Ein Beitrag zur sozial-ökologischen Transformation (pp. 47–64). Nomos Verlag. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748929413-47
Strachwitz, R., Priller, E., & Triebe, B. (2020). Handbuch Zivilgesellschaft. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110553475
Swedberg, R. (2020). Exploratory research. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 17–41). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.002
Toepler, S. (2023). Rereading Salamon: Why Voluntary Failure Theory is Not (Really) About Voluntary Failures. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 14(4), 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2023-0080
Toepler, S., Zimmer, A., Levy, K., & Fröhlich, C. (2023). Beyond the Partnership Paradigm: Toward an Extended Typology of Government/Nonprofit Relationship Patterns. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(1_suppl), 160–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221112890
Wuthnow, R., & Anheier, H. K. (Eds.). (1991). Between States and Markets: The Voluntary Sector in Comparative Perspective. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2075567
Zimmer, A. (1999). Corporatism Revisited – The Legacy of History and the German Nonprofit Sector. Voluntas, 10(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021439703650
Zimmer, A., & Priller, E. (2021). A Patchwork Quilt of Programs. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 12(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2020-0050
Zimmer, A., Priller, E., & Anheier, H. K. (2022). Der Nonprofit-Sektor in Deutschland. In M. Meyer, R. Simsa, & C. Badelt (Eds.), Handbuch der Nonprofit-Organisationen (pp. 17–36). Schäffer–Poeschel. https://doi.org/10.34156/9783791055633-17
Zimmer, A., & Priller, E. (2023). Germany – Still a Welfare Partnership Country?. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 14(4), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2022-0043
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rupert Graf Strachwitz, Stefan Toepler
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
